Pope stuff
Apr. 19th, 2005 03:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For all the things one might legitimately hold against Ratzinger, calling him a Nazi is pretty cheap. As I understand it, his involvement with die Hitler Jugend was not voluntary, nor was his military service. He deserted his unit in 1945. If I'm wrong about this, please let me know.
But if I'm not, chill out with the Nazi remarks. Feel free to attack him for any currently espoused beliefs or actions.
But if I'm not, chill out with the Nazi remarks. Feel free to attack him for any currently espoused beliefs or actions.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-19 08:27 pm (UTC)But he was no hero, either.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-19 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-19 08:35 pm (UTC)There are also some situations in which I believe the ethical choice is to die, and that still counts as having a choice -- and it's my understanding that the Catholic Church shares that belief, although not necessarily on behalf of the same things.
He was a Nazi, just like a drafted soldier is still a soldier, though not in the same way as a volunteer is. I agree, it can be used as a cheap shot, but it can also be a serious question, particularly in combination with his other actions and views.
Personally, I don't see a statute of limitations on beliefs and views. I am allowed to resent, mistrust, dislike, and choose not to respect somebody for things they've done or said in the past even if they aren't doing them right this second, and all the more so if I have reason, in what they are doing right this second, to doubt that they understand why I find their previous actions reprehensible. I may choose to forgive someone who gives me reason to think they've seen the error of their ways, but they're not entitled to it automatically.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 01:58 am (UTC)I certainly resent, mistrust and dislike his opinions on many things, and don't like what his election might mean for the future of the church, but he's not a Nazi.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 02:57 pm (UTC)If he did really go looking for something better in the church, it's doubly sad that he turned to narrow-minded, small-hearted dogma. And since he became a powerful and influential member of the church, I do hold him accountable for other ugly choices, namely sheltering child molesters and supporting ideology that spreads AIDS and causes children to be born into poverty. Calling himself Benedict when he speaks so much ugliness is hypocrisy enough for me.
And I think I've used the word ugly way too many times in this post. Bad writer, no biscuit.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-19 09:49 pm (UTC)but I was planning on calling him Pope No anyway.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 05:56 pm (UTC)